John Patrick Moffat also known as Patrick Paul Pinson v George Henry Seears

[1986] NTSC 59

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › Appeals under Justices Act
3. › Appeal by way of rehearing
4. › Whether judge exercises own discretion on sentence
5. › Justices Act (NT), ss 120(3), 121C, 163
1. Sentencing
2. › Multiple offences
3. › Totality principle
4. › Whether aggregate of sentences manifestly excessive
5. › Touchstone for application of totality principle
6. › Aggregate should not usually be substantially above upper limit of range for most serious offence
1. Sentencing
2. › Concurrent and cumulative sentences
3. › When sentences should be directed to be served concurrently or consecutively
4. › Whether offences taken together constitute single invasion of same legally protected interest
1. Sentencing
2. › Disparity of sentence
3. › Co-offender granted immediate conditional release
4. › When disparity of sentence an effective ground of appeal

Quick Take

On an appeal under s 163 of the Justices Act (NT), the appellate judge exercises an independent sentencing discretion rather than reviewing the magistrate's discretion for House v The King error. The totality principle requires that the aggregate of sentences should not usually be substantially above the upper limit of the range applicable to the most serious offence; where the aggregate exceeds the 2-year maximum for summary disposal, the magistrate should consider referring the matter to the Supreme Court under s 121C. The test for whether sentences should be cumulative or concurrent is whether the offences constitute a single invasion of the same legally protected interest.