A defendant seeking leave to file a third party notice out of time must provide sufficiently specific supporting material to demonstrate that the public policy behind third party joinder would be advanced. General or conditional assertions of potential claims against the proposed third party may be insufficient. Where the joinder would cause significant delay to the plaintiff's claim, the balance of convenience may favour refusal, with the defendant left to pursue separate proceedings and later seek consolidation.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.