Where fresh evidence of a co-offender's sentence is admitted on a Justices Act appeal, the appeal does not become a de novo hearing; the court applies the Lowe v The Queen disparity test requiring a manifest discrepancy giving rise to a justifiable sense of grievance. Even where cumulative sentences ought to have been concurrent, no substantial miscarriage of justice occurs if the aggregate sentence is proportionate to the total criminality.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.