A Magistrate who places undue emphasis on the prevalence of shoplifting and general deterrence while giving insufficient weight to an offender's personal circumstances — including psychological dysfunction, domestic violence, ill health and rehabilitation prospects — commits an error in the exercise of the sentencing discretion warranting appellate intervention. The prevalence of a particular offence can seldom, if ever, be the dominant sentencing factor.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 16 later cases that cite this judgment.