An appeal under s 35 of the Pay-Roll Tax Act (NT) from the Commissioner's refusal to exclude a company from a pay-roll tax group is to be determined on the material before the Commissioner alone; fresh evidence is not admissible. If the Commissioner is found to have erred, the Court reviews the original material and determines the question itself, but does not permit the taxpayer to enhance or supplement its case. The word 'substantially' in s 17H(1) calls for the exercise of judgment, and the section requires both substantial independence and substantial absence of connection to be established. A significant inter-company debt, shared personnel in key roles, and inter-company trading in services may preclude exclusion even where the nature of the businesses is quite different.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.