Hazel Edith Arnold v Cth and Elevators Pty Limited [1995] ACTSC 129 — Barrister AI
← Back
Hazel Edith Arnold v Cth and Elevators Pty Limited
[1995] ACTSC 129
Supreme Court of the ACT
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Case Details
Citation
[1995] ACTSC 129
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
