The DPP's failure to comply with directions made, and undertakings and assurances given, at status conferences may amount to an abuse of process founding jurisdiction to stay criminal proceedings. However, the power to stay must be exercised to prevent the abuse, not as a punishment for non-compliance. The court left open whether it may refuse to accept a nolle prosequi where to do so would permit an abuse of process.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 29 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 29 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.