The purpose of identifying documents in an affidavit claiming legal professional privilege is to enable the court to order production if the privilege is found not to attach, not to enable the opposing party to test the validity of the claim. Identification by date ranges, letter markings, and individual numbering is sufficient. The South Australian approach in Kadlunga requiring descriptions enabling the opposing party to form a prima facie view as to the correctness of the privilege claim is not to be followed in Queensland.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.