Matthews v Coles Supermarket

[1998] NTSC 79

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Appeal
2. › Work Health Court
3. › compensation claim for household services and necessary attendant care
4. › magistrate correctly allowed amendment to pleadings which raised an arguable point.
1. Appeal
2. › Work Health Court
3. › issues raised in answer by way of counterclaim not objected to at s106 compulsory pre trial conference
4. › Magistrate has discretionary power to make order allowing counterclaim

Citation[1998] NTSC 79

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in