The minimum term component of a sentence for armed robbery must reflect the objective gravity of the crime and cannot be reduced below a level commensurate with that gravity merely because of rehabilitation prospects, even where special circumstances are found. A sentencing judge who varies the statutory proportions in favour of a lengthier additional term must ensure the minimum term still reflects the objective circumstances. It is not sufficient to merely refer to the guideline judgment in Henry; the principles must be applied.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.