Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Seamez v McLaughlin [1999] NSWSC 9 — Breach Of Contractual Duty & Acts Cited: — Barrister AI

Seamez v McLaughlin

[1999] NSWSC 9

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Solicitor and client - breach of contractual duty - no question of principle involved
1. Acts Cited:

Case Details

Citation[1999] NSWSC 9

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 20 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 20 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by20

2026Agnello v Maliganis Edwards Johnson (No 2)ACTSC 84
2024Singh v Health Care Complaints CommissionNSWSC 1307
2024Fu v Bondi Junction Prime Pty LtdFedCFamC2G 513
2022No 1 Victoria Dragons Pty Ltd v AEN Developments Pty LtdNSWSC 1345
and 16 more after sign-in

Relies on9

1996Citicorp Australia Ltd v O'Brien and OrsNSWSC 514
1988Hawkins v ClaytonHCA 15
1983Re Clyne, Peter Leopold v Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of TaxationFCA 258
1916Charlick v Foley Brothers LimitedHCA 27
and 5 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works