Muirhead v Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust

[1999] QCA 513

Queensland Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Renewal of originating process
3. › Plaint not served within limitation period
4. › Whether good reason to renew
5. › Whether denial of ability to pursue action alone constitutes good reason
6. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), r 24
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Renewal of originating process
3. › Onus on applicant
4. › Whether applicant must show no significant prejudice to defendant
5. › Relevance of expiry of limitation period
6. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), r 24
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Renewal of originating process
3. › Delay in service
4. › Whether awaiting conclusive medical reports constitutes good reason after limitation period expired
5. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), r 24
1. Limitation of Actions
2. › Expiry of limitation period
3. › Renewal of originating process as equivalent to extension of time
4. › Principles governing exercise of discretion
5. › Prejudice to defendant from delay

Quick Take

The fact that a plaintiff will lose the ability to pursue an action if renewal is refused cannot alone constitute 'good reason' under r 24 UCPR, as that circumstance is present in every such application where the limitation period has expired. Solicitors who delay service of originating process to await medical reports bear the risk that this will not constitute good reason for renewal once the limitation period has passed. The applicant for renewal bears the onus of establishing both good reason and the absence of significant prejudice to the defendant.