Where the Crown case against an accessory requires knowledge of a weapon as a prerequisite for complicity in both a possession offence and a wounding offence, an acquittal on the possession charge is practically inconsistent with a conviction for the wounding offence, and the conviction cannot stand. The inadvertent disclosure of an accused's criminal history does not automatically require discharge of the jury; the matter is within the trial judge's discretion, particularly where defence counsel declines to seek any corrective measure.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.