› on grounds that manifestly inadequate and failure to take into account period in custody for breach of bail
› basis of appeal is that Magistrate’s sentencing discretion miscarried
› took into account subjective features
› inadequacy of the sentence is apparent or plain
› appeal allowed
Sentencing Act 1995 (NT), s 40 (1), (2) and (6), s 43
Thompson v Mamarika Supreme Court of the Northern Territory Martin CJ unreported 23 December 1993; Leaney v Bell [1992] NTSC 63; (1992) 108 FLR 360; R v Mulholland (1991) 1 NTLR 1; Lade v Mamarika [1986] NTSC 32; (1986) 83 FLR 312; Blackman v Police Supreme Court of South Australia Bleby J unreported 1 6 March 1998; R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; Everett v The Queen [1994] HCA 49; (1994) 181 CLR 295, referred to.
