Where a third-party association engages and instructs solicitors on behalf of a party, the presumption of a retainer between the party and the solicitor on the record is not rebutted merely by the third party's involvement, particularly where the party directs the solicitors to take instructions from the third party and pays part of the costs. The indemnity principle is satisfied where there is a liability between solicitor and client, even if the prospect of payment is remote.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.