Where one defendant in a multi-defendant proceeding makes a comprehensive offer to contribute that is not accepted, the inability of the offeree defendants to agree among themselves on apportionment of contribution is not ordinarily a proper basis for declining to give the offering defendant the benefit of costs savings. The intransigence of a particular co-defendant may affect the apportionment of the costs burden between the offeree defendants, but should not deprive the offering defendant of costs relief. Each offeree defendant can protect itself by making its own offer to the other co-defendants.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.