The case illustrates the application of multiple procedural bars — standing, issue estoppel, res judicata, Anshun estoppel, abuse of process, and limitation — to serial litigation arising from the same underlying dispute. A mortgagee in possession claim is premature where no sale is being attempted, no offer to redeem has been made, and no redemption orders are sought. A plea of concealed fraud under s 27 of the Limitation Act 1935 (WA) requires proof of dishonesty or moral turpitude, not merely error or oversight, and the limitation extension runs only to the date the fraud could with reasonable diligence have been discovered.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.