Third parties who acquire contractual rights with full knowledge of a pending claim for injunction restraining the very transaction they enter into will not be afforded significant weight in the balance of convenience and may be denied undertakings as to damages. A proposed purchaser with no accrued or vested rights, but merely an expectation of entering into a contract to be restrained, has no proper ground for requiring an undertaking as to damages from the party obtaining the injunction.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.