A disciplinary tribunal that accepts a complainant's evidence must deal in its reasons with significant conflicts between that evidence and unchallenged evidence favourable to the practitioner; a bare statement that the tribunal found no impracticability in the practitioner's conduct is insufficient. Where three rational possibilities exist on the balance of probabilities, it is particularly conducive to error to reject possibilities one by one rather than making a final assessment.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.