Casino employees may lawfully detain persons reasonably suspected of being excluded persons under s 84 of the Casino Control Act 1992, as cl 23(a) of the Casino Control Regulation 1995 is validly made and not inconsistent with the removal obligation in s 85(2). Touching a person on the shoulder for the purpose of engaging their attention does not constitute a battery where no greater degree of physical contact than reasonably necessary is used, applying the Collins v Wilcock framework rather than requiring proof of hostile intent.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 20 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 20 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.