Where a contract expressly provides for termination upon breach of one obligation but not another, this is a strong indicator that the latter obligation is not an essential term. In sponsorship agreements, a specification as to logo colours is unlikely to be an essential term where the sponsor has itself accepted variations in other contexts. A party's leisurely response to a proposed breach is relevant to whether the breach of an intermediate term is of sufficient gravity to justify termination.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.