Defendants who delay in bringing applications for security for costs must explain their delay, particularly where the plaintiff has incurred significant irrecoverable costs during the period of delay. A primary judge must give adequate reasons addressing the significance of such delay. While the duty to give reasons for interlocutory orders is lower than for trial orders, security for costs applications can significantly affect substantive rights and require sufficient reasoning.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 39 later cases that cite this judgment.
7 of the 39 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.