Where a trial judge's finding of liability depends on accepting the credibility of a plaintiff whose evidence is contradicted by multiple witnesses and objective records, the judge's reasons must demonstrate that the acceptance of credibility followed due consideration of the contrary evidence. A bare assertion of acceptance based on observation of the witness, without addressing the substantial contrary material, constitutes inadequate reasons warranting a new trial. The deficiency lies in the weighing process as revealed in the reasons, not in the weight ultimately assigned.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.