An obvious typographical error in the end date of a listening device warrant does not invalidate the warrant where the intended date is clear and no person required to act on the warrant could have been misled. Listening device warrants, unlike search warrants, do not need to be produced to affected persons and therefore do not require the same degree of facial clarity.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.