The case is a straightforward application of the M v The Queen test for unreasonable verdicts in the context of a circumstantial conspiracy to defraud charge. The Court found that compelling spreadsheet evidence showing dramatic disparities in drum invoicing during the relevant period, combined with the absence of proper records and unsatisfactory explanations from the appellants, was sufficient to sustain the jury's verdict. General deterrence is a significant sentencing consideration in cases involving breach of trust by employees over an extended period.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.