A guilty plea procured by incorrect advice that the trial judge expressed views about the accused's likelihood of conviction is a fundamental irregularity constituting a miscarriage of justice, regardless of the strength of the Crown case. It is sufficient that the false information materially contributed to the maintenance of an earlier decision to plead guilty. Legal practitioners owe a duty to the court not to give clients false information about a trial judge's views on conviction prospects.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 37 later cases that cite this judgment.
6 of the 37 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.