DNA profiling evidence and associated statistical probability calculations are admissible in Tasmanian criminal trials. Challenges to the statistical methodology underlying DNA probability opinions go to weight and jury direction, not admissibility. Trial judges are not required to direct juries that DNA statistical methods have 'no legal precedent'. The opinion of the forensic witness in this case was expressed in general terms and the trial judge's directions adequately addressed the limitations of the evidence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.