← Back
Bensky v Mercantile Mutual Insurance Company Limited
[2001] WADC 205
District Court of Western Australia
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Practice - Western Australia - Rules of the Supreme Court of Western Australia - Order 66 review of taxation of costs under items 6(a), 13, 14(a), (c) and (f) and 16 for disbursements
Case Details
Citation
[2001] WADC 205
Court
WADC
Jurisdiction
Western Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
Bensky v Mercantile Mutual Insurance Company Limited [2001] WADC 205 — Western Australia — Barrister AI
