Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Foreman v Pargin & Anor [2001] WASCA 351 — Sentencing & Ambiguity In — Barrister AI

Foreman v Pargin & Anor

[2001] WASCA 351

Western Australia Court of Appeal

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal law - Sentencing - Whether
1. parole and suspended imprisonment sufficiently considered - Ambiguity in
1. calculation of aggregate
1. term - Appeal against sentence allowed

Case Details

Citation[2001] WASCA 351

CourtWASCA

JurisdictionWestern Australia

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2003Acatincai v Insurance Commission of Western AustraliaWASCA 39

Relies on3

2001Cross v CookWASCA 242
1997POLICE v TREVOR HAROLD CADD, JOHN PATRICK HALL, ATTILA TIBOR ILLES, VASILIOS VLACHOS and MARK ADRIAN QUINN Nos. SCGRG-96-2306, SCGRG-96-2334, SCGRG-96-2335, SCGRG-96-2327, SCGRG-97-368 Judgment No. 6187 Number of pages - 58 Criminal law - prosecution appeals against sentences - driving offences (1997) 69 SASR 150SASC 6187
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works