Under AS2124-1992, the superintendent's power to extend time for practical completion notwithstanding non-compliance with the contractual claims procedure survives termination of the contract for the builder's breach. Non-disclosure of an agreement between principal and superintendent is not misleading under s 52 TPA where the agreement, on its true construction, has no relevant impact on the superintendent's certifying functions, even if commercial people might read it otherwise. Failure to comply strictly with cl.40.2 notification requirements does not disentitle a builder to payment for a variation where a price was submitted at some time and a direction to proceed was given.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 43 later cases that cite this judgment.
8 of the 43 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.