Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Clutha v Millar (No.2)

[2002] NSWSC 523

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to amend statement of claim - whether Court has jurisdiction to grant leave to amend under Supreme Court Rules where originating process was statute-barred
1. Acts Cited:
1. Limitations Act 1969 (NSW) s 63
1. Supreme Court Rules Pt 20

Case Details

Citation[2002] NSWSC 523

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.

2 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by6

2007Greater Lithgow City Council v WolfendenNSWCA 180
2005Ingot v Macquarie [no 3]NSWSC 255
2004New Cap Reinsurance v Reaseguros Alianza SANSWSC 787
2002Clutha v Millar (No.5)NSWSC 833
and 2 more after sign-in

Relies on4

2002Clutha v MillarNSWSC 362
1985Marlin Brands Australia Ltd v Brando Aus Holdco Pty LtdNSWCA 59
1957Sophron v Nominal DefendantHCA 27
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works