[SECURITY FOR COSTS] - Three of six plaintiffs resident outside the jurisdiction - One of six plaintiffs not impecunious - Whether jursidiction to make orders for security against other impecunious plaintiffs - Whether impecuniosity caused by the defendants - No claim that security would stultify litigation - Aim to provide adequate protection to defendants without unfairly prejudicing the plaintiffs.
Acts Cited:
Australian Security and Investment Commission Act 1989 (Cth)
Companies Act 1989 (UK)
Case Details
Citation[2002] NSWSC 609
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.
