Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Lakshman v Law Image [2002] NSWSC 888 — Corporations & Acts Cited: — Barrister AI

Lakshman v Law Image

[2002] NSWSC 888

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. CORPORATIONS - whether leave under s237 of the Corporations Act 2001 should be granted to a director of a company to bring proceedings on behalf of that company
1. Acts Cited:
1. Corporations Act 2001, s182, s236, s237

Case Details

Citation[2002] NSWSC 888

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by5

2017Stanton (WA) P/L v Vasquez InvestmentsNSWSC 128
2010Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd v Cassegrain; Cassegrain v Gerard Cassegrain & CoNSWSC 91
2005Fiduciary v Morningstar ResearchNSWSC 442
2003McLean & Anor v Lake Como Venture P/L & Anor; Lake Como Venture P/L & Ors v Progressive Projects P/L & OrsQCA 562
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on6

2002Swansson v PrattNSWSC 583
2002Metyor Inc & Anor v Queensland Electronic Switching P/L & OrsQCA 269
2002Goozee v GraphicNSWSC 640
2001Keyrate P/L v Hamarc P/L & OrsNSWSC 491
and 2 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works