Golotta v Incroft Pty Ltd [2002] NTSC 37 — Restraint On Trade & Solicitor’s Duty To Advise. — Barrister AI
← Back
Golotta v Incroft Pty Ltd
[2002] NTSC 37
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+6 more
Contracts
›
Restraint on trade
›
whether a solicitor failed to advise inclusion of a restraint on trade clause in a contract for sale of business
Contracts
›
Solicitor’s duty to advise.
Voli v Inglewood Shire Council [1963] HCA 15; (1963) 110 CLR 74, referred to.
Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539, referred to.
Case Details
Citation
[2002] NTSC 37
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
