Hooper v Territory Insurance Office & Anor [2002] NTSC 5 — Motor Accidents Compensation — Barrister AI
← Back
Hooper v Territory Insurance Office & Anor
[2002] NTSC 5
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
Motor accidents compensation
›
reference to Motor Accidents (Compensation) Appeal Tribunal
›
interpretation of s 22 of the Motor Accidents (Compensation) Act 1979 (NT)
›
words and phrases
›
“relative needs and degrees of dependency of the dependent child or children”
›
history of legislation
›
assessment of proportion of fund payable.
Motor Accidents (Compensation) Act 1979 (NT), s 22, s 22(1)(b)(ii) and s 29
Sweeney v Fitzhardinge [1906] HCA 73; (1906) 4 CLR 716, considered.
Builders Licensing Board v Sperway Constructions [1976] HCA 62; (1976) 135 CLR 616, considered.
Case Details
Citation
[2002] NTSC 5
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
