Where an armed robbery sentence already reflects the infliction of injury on the victim (as evidenced by disparity with the sentence for robbery of a co-victim who was not injured), ordering cumulation of a separate sentence for recklessly causing injury to the same victim constitutes impermissible double punishment. A conviction and concurrent sentence for the injury offence remains appropriate.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.