Case management considerations and the public interest in expeditious resolution of litigation, even in a test case of general importance, cannot prevail over the substantial injustice of requiring a party to proceed to trial when unable properly to present its case due to the unavailability of its principal expert witness. Where a test case is involved, the public interest itself requires that the court be fully informed, which may favour adjournment rather than expedition.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 10 later cases that cite this judgment.