A remedial constructive trust arising from claims of undue influence, unconscionable conduct or estoppel does not constitute a pre-existing right or interest in land capable of protection by caveat before the remedy has been obtained. An absolute caveat is irregular where only a limited interest is claimed. Where a caveat fails on technical grounds but there is an arguable underlying equitable claim, an injunction on conditions may be an appropriate alternative.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 12 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.