Confirms that in child sexual abuse prosecutions, prior sexual offending against the same complainant is admissible as relationship evidence even where there is a significant temporal gap (approximately 6 years), provided the trial judge directs the jury on the three minimum requirements: reliability of the evidence, its limited purpose of showing the nature of the relationship, and that it cannot substitute for proof of the charged conduct beyond reasonable doubt. Practitioners should note that an explicit 'propensity' warning is not mandatory if the judge adequately conveys the limited permissible use of the evidence.
The full text is available to signed-in members.