Where a person's ultimate conclusion of law (that conduct is lawful) is vitiated by an earlier honest and reasonable but mistaken belief as to a relevant fact — such as a government agency's misrepresentation that regulatory documentation is complete when it is not — the mistake is properly characterised as one of fact for the purposes of s 24 of the Criminal Code 1913 (WA). The doctrine of officially induced error of law has not been recognised in Western Australia and the Griffith Code-based Criminal Code may preclude its adoption.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.