The requirement for leave to raise on appeal a point not taken at trial is not a mere formality, particularly where experienced counsel was present at trial and did not take exception to the directions. The presence of experienced counsel at trial who did not object to directions is a significant factor weighing against the grant of leave. A six-month disparity in non-parole periods between co-offenders may be justified where different material was before the sentencing judge on different occasions.
The full text is available to signed-in members.