The AAT (and by extension, courts) must not rely on evidence of the subjective purpose of the taxpayer or other persons in drawing the conclusion required by s 177D, and must consider all tax benefits identified by the Commissioner in the alternative particularisation of the scheme.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 18 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 18 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.