A decision-maker does not fail to address an integer of a claim merely by addressing it in a less formal or less elegantly structured manner than indicated. Reading the Tribunal's reasons as a whole, the correct question was asked even where the formal structure of the reasons suggested an omission. The scope of Craig-type errors as jurisdictional error surviving the s 474 privative clause was left unresolved, with the judges expressing divergent obiter views.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 9 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 9 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.