An operator of a recreational facility that posts warning signs about inherent risks, makes protective equipment available for hire, provides a beginner's area, and employs trained staff does not breach its duty of care merely because it fails to specifically draw a beginner patron's attention to the availability of protective gear or the specific risk of injury. The correct question is whether the failure to eliminate the risk demonstrates a want of reasonable care, not merely whether the risk was preventable.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.