An ambiguous or uncertain representation may still give rise to promissory estoppel where reliance on it produces an unconscionable result, with equity fashioning relief based on the concept of minimum detriment. A subsequent formal agreement (such as an MOU) does not necessarily supersede prior oral representations for the purposes of equitable estoppel, where the parties' subjective intentions show they did not intend the agreement to be a complete record of obligations. However, the terms of such an agreement may limit the scope of equitable compensation, particularly where the claimant has enjoyed the benefits offered under the agreement.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 29 later cases that cite this judgment.
6 of the 29 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.