A trial judge who directs the jury that 'beyond reasonable doubt' are 'ordinary everyday words' does not thereby misdirect the jury, provided the direction in context conveys that the words require no further definition. Where a jury asks whether reasonable doubt is their 'own individual view' or an 'independent definition', it is desirable but not obligatory for the trial judge to directly answer the question, provided the totality of directions (including any Black direction and unanimity directions) sufficiently conveys that the standard is subjective and individual to each juror.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.