Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Hyde v Holland [2003] NSWSC 733 — Construction & Acts Cited: — Barrister AI

Hyde v Holland

[2003] NSWSC 733

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. WILLS - construction - condition that residuary beneficiary "has attended Alcoholics Anonymous and complied with their requirements concerning sobriety for a period of not less than two (2) years" - condition precedent or subsequent - test of certainty for condition precedent
1. Acts Cited:

Case Details

Citation[2003] NSWSC 733

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by6

2023Barnes v Pope in his capacity as administrator of the Estate of Lynette Margaret HoughNSWSC 685
2016Estate of Grahame David WrightNSWSC 1779
2010Tantau v MacFarlaneNSWSC 224
2009Arnott v LeongNSWSC 187
and 2 more after sign-in

Relies on15

2003Howell v HydeNSWSC 732
2003Kay v South Eastern Sydney Area Health ServiceNSWSC 292
2001Marks v PopeNSWSC 105
1999Watson v WatsonNSWSC 325
and 11 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works