A global offer to settle made on behalf of multiple plaintiffs without separating the amounts attributable to each plaintiff does not constitute a valid offer under Part 5 of Chapter 9 of the UCPR. However, the court retains a general discretion to order indemnity costs from the date of such an offer where the defendants were not disadvantaged by the global nature of the offer, particularly where one plaintiff's claim alone with interest exceeded the offer amount. Practitioners acting for multiple plaintiffs should make separate offers for each plaintiff to ensure compliance with the UCPR.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.