The criterion for striking out proceedings based on pre-litigation destruction of evidence is whether the destruction amounted to an attempt to pervert the course of justice or contempt of court, requiring proof of intention to interfere with the administration of justice. A trial is not rendered unfair merely because some relevant evidence is unavailable; the court will assess whether the destruction was deliberate and whether the evidence was truly critical.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 12 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.