Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Ahmad v The Queen [2003] WASCA 234 — Appeal & Home Invasion And Abduction — Barrister AI

Ahmad v The Queen

[2003] WASCA 234

Western Australia Court of Appeal

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal law and procedure - Appeal
1. against sentence - Home invasion and abduction - Applicability of s 622 of
1. Criminal Code - Whether trial Judge applied appropriate standard of proof
1. - Parity principle - Whether sentencing Judge failed to apply totality

Case Details

Citation[2003] WASCA 234

CourtWASCA

JurisdictionWestern Australia

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

2 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by5

2016Collard v The State of Western AustraliaWASCA 135
2011Starr v The State of Western AustraliaWASCA 170
2008The State of Western Australia v AmooreWASCA 65
2007Tubb v The State of Western AustraliaWASCA 106
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on12

2003Weininger v RHCA 14
2002Court of Criminal Appeal Citation : Payne v The QueenWASCA 186
2002Ahmad v The QueenWASCA 70
2001Cheung v RHCA 67
and 8 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works